The Problem of Contemporary Art
by Richard Gleaves

In the context of reviewing the current show at MOCA, ArtScene writer Mario Cutajar sidehands some acute insights for the benefit of artists, critics, and galleristas who find themselves unhappy with their current place in the world:
This imperative to ceaselessly produce stuff and fill ... large empty spaces ... is for me one of the most oppressive features of contemporary art…
I cannot help but think that this horror [of empty spaces] that drives artists to incessant production is the apprehension that the time of art is over. Duchamp announced as much with his ready-mades but we’ve pretended that those were just provocations. We’ve read Walter Benjamin on the death of the aura and technology’s reduction of art to distraction.
But the aura of the artwork, which was its connection to the sacred, couldn’t be allowed to evaporate because, strangely enough, art cannot be commodified without some remnant of the sacred remaining associated with it. The paradox is that we need art to have something like a “soul” in order to trade it at a price above what mere goods fetch.
The last purchase that art had on something resembling spirituality was through the much-abused notion of criticality. That too is now used up thanks to the postmodernist conflation of critique and complicity.
And despite attempts to reinvent the idea of community through subcultural affiliation, community would seem to require a foundation that exceeds the atomizing power of capital, which ceaselessly uproots and disperses people...
The larger question of what art’s purpose might be beyond amusing jaded rich people or contributing a veneer of [civic] sophistication ... will remain.
This should not be seen as a manifesto to commit identity suicide and take up volleyball, but rather as a call to think and think hard about all aspects of your practice, and then strive to ensure that none are based on the boatload of received ideas that pass these days for art.
One possible art centers on the idea of user experience — a kind of interactive participatory static theatre — which can be pursued in venues as large as the Jacobs building, or as small as a zine. In such a paradigm the traditional art object assumes the role of recyclable prop. But this is only one of many possible approaches: the important thing is to pursue a practice that actually fits with what's happening today in your life, in your society, on your planet.


Comments
what an insult!
how dare Mario Cutajar to question artists who produce stuff and fill spaces with their stuff.
marcel duchamp produced stuff. he played chess and made stuff.
art is all over?
no! art is where you find it.
artists are born to make stuff.
composers are born to make stuff.
writers are born to make stuff.
Mario Cutajar makes stuff.
what would artists do if they couldn't make stuff?
post comment:
richard, your "DOOM & GLOOM" really sparkles.
Posted by: bob matheny | janvier 26, 2010 04:23 PM
My art practice is in direct conflict with my eco/green/environmental practice and I struggle with this. What do I do, what can I do? How does my practice fit with what's happening today in my life, in my society, on my planet. Can I be an artist and not make stuff to fill spaces. Can I come to terms with this, make the commitment.
I am not sure, but I thank you for making me think about it, again.
Posted by: Lori Lipsman | janvier 26, 2010 07:37 PM
http://www.crownpoint.com/images/act-drinking-beer-friends-highest-form-art
Posted by: Brian Goeltzenleuchter | janvier 27, 2010 08:39 AM