Bret J. Barrett — "Transports of Form"
by Kevin Freitas
I heard about Bret Barrett before I ever met him. People would talk about some artist making kinetic sculptures out of his garage in some back alley off of El Cajon Boulevard. They said I should check out his work. And then one day, while getting a tattoo at Body Marks Tattoo on El Cajon, a guy comes in with a camera and starts taking pictures of the ceiling. Mark form Body Marks lets artists decorate the acoustic panels overhead. As it turns out, it was Bret Barrett taking the photos. We chatted awhile and then he left as quickly and as quietly as when he walked in. I didn’t meet him again until a few months later when he was part of a group show at the now defunct Zedism Gallery in Normal Heights.
This gallery is currently being replaced by a Subway sandwich shop. People have to eat it seems and no appetite for art.
Hanging in the back corner of the gallery then, was a painting by Barrett entitled “Cat’s Eye”. It was blinking at me. As I moved closer I realized it was not just a painting but an assemblage of whirligigs, blinking lights, and mechanized parts repetitively performing mundane tasks but completely animating the surface of the painting. It was brilliant. I bought it. Thus began a relationship with and admiration of Bret Barrett’s paintings and kinetic sculptures, one that has lasted for several years now. Many of his works adorn the walls of my apartment and continue to enchant me.
Barrett is part of a loosely defined group of painters here in San Diego that have quietly and consistently produced bodies of work that are recognized for their technical prowess, as well as, their subject matter. Not quite Pop Surrealist and not quite the Juxtapoz School of Art — though many have been featured between the magazine’s cover — they often provide a wry, humorous and sometimes biting commentary on society poking fun at corporate industry, politics, and world events. Artists such as Dark Vomit aka Kelly Hutchison, Paul Brogden, and Brian Dombrowsky would make up the rest of this group. Former San Diego resident Dave Miles I would also happily include. What sets these artists apart from say a Matt Stallings is that they can paint — truly paint. No small feat in today’s image laden art world.
Reptilian Swashbuckler - Bret J. Barrett
Some of Barrett’s more memorable exhibits were with fellow colleague Kelly Hutchison at the Rubber Rose Gallery in North Park or at the Art of Framing Gallery in Normal Heights where Barrett is showing now. “Transports of Form” is Barrett’s second major solo show at Art of Framing and he has come prepared with a whole new body of work. It is a more focused and thematic exhibit than I am used to seeing by Barrett. I admire his tenacity and commitment to keeping the work “on track” so to speak, even when some of the smaller sculptural works feel forced and redundant.
Steam Punked: The Surrender of Horse Power - Bret Barrett
Transports of Form, its conception at least, came from a recurring dream Barrett said. I have just realized that Barrett has spoken of dream imagery before when referencing his work, but I never took too much stock of it and the impact it has on his work until now. I guess it is the aversion I have to the notion of using dreams as a source of imagery to make artwork. Naïve of me I know, but still, it seems so shamanistic — I’ll stop before I dig the hole deeper. But Transports of Form has a literal and quite physical importance to Barrett as well, since his sole means of transportation is by foot — this meant he told me, carrying all the work for this show from his home to the gallery. Beyond any political or environmental reasons for not wanting to own a car, Barrett understands that walking has its benefits of course — it’s healthy, but it also has its disadvantages, prolonging travel time considerably and increasing the dependence on others who do own cars. What walking does do effectively though, is change the appreciation and understanding of the landscape around us; it heightens that appreciation allowing the person walking to see things normally passed by in an instant in a car. It brings the human experience down to a humanistic and primitive level — to a level just before the invention of the wheel.
Chicken Sub (Toasted) top - Chicken Sub (Emerging) bottom - Bret Barrett
There is a sort of primitiveness that reigns throughout the work of Barrett, it comes through in the very rudimentary but very delicate kinetic sculptures he makes that vacillate between part-time garage mechanics slash inventors club slash low-brow low-tech tinkering that has no real purpose beyond the enjoyment of making something spin, gyrate, blink, rattle, and clang along. A fine example of this and by far the most poetic work in the show is the sculpture sitting in the front window of the gallery. The video featured above gives you an idea of its supreme wackiness, humor, on the brink of self-destruction and twirling, spinning, dildo-like proboscises surrounded by wire forms that encase brightly colored balls that rock back and forth in rhythm to some unheard orgasmic orchestra on the verge of climaxing or dying. A certain sort of primitiveness also appears in the paintings he makes and the forms he uses to convey an imaginary world filled with archaic symbols and floating UFO like shapes. One form you’ll find throughout Barrett’s work is a sort of hybridized seed pod inspired from a milk thistle plant, seeds of which, herbalists have used for over 2000 years to treat chronic liver disease.
Transports of Forms blends this primitiveness and mankind’s experiences, knowledge and ability to stand and walk on his own two feet into prehistoric, hybridized reptilian combines of animals and various transportation vehicles — if only the technology existed god willing, it would culminate a long evolutionary chain of Man, Beast, and Machine working together as one ever since horses were tamed, James Watts overhauled the steam engine and Jack Kilby invented the computer chip — but it would not be in the hopes of creating these Frankenstein-ish monstrosities of pachyderm heavy metal, but as a “thought experiment” (to quote a colleague) and imagine a world perhaps one day, where an alternative means of transportation adapted to the lifestyle and speed of its human counterparts could exist. It could also be seen as a broad commentary on an impending if not long overdue extinction of the human race and the second coming of the dinosaur age. Or to push the metaphor even further, a fragile eco-system dependant on the industrial and mechanical leftovers of mankind for survival and protection. And this is where the work in Transports of Form starts to become a bit problematic. Is anything of this possible or believable?
Pink Vanelephant (model) - Bret Barrett
Pink Vanelephant - Bret Barrett
Not all of the works in this exhibit do enough to capture my imagination. They are under no obligation to do so. But at times, it feels like I have caught the tail end of a story or I find myself watching some Planet of the Apes mini-series out of sequence or B-movie horror picture show. The camera cuts away from the set and we see that Godzilla is nothing more than a man in costume. There is plenty of humor in this exhibit and superb painting but is it enough to carry an idea that feels novelistic at times and divulges almost nothing as to its intent beyond the hybridization of two very different sources? Even Sid Phillips from Toy Story had a reason for dismembering his toys, but beyond the titles of some of the works on view – “Chicken Sub (toasted)”, “Tank Chick”, “Bottle-Nose Jet” or “Steam Punked: The Surrender of Horse Power” (both a painting and an actual model train that has a plastic horse’s head mounted on the front of the locomotive like some figurehead on a ship) is there ample enough content and interest to keep ours up and motivated? I don’t wish to be harsh because I can appreciate the concept, take pleasure in seeing what a VW bus crossed with a pink elephant would look like, and chuckle at some inside jokes and visual puns. I can marvel at the boyhood wonderment of discovering solutions to oblique problems or finding the exact component to make something run. I can also sympathize with the process and creative drive that inspired these creations and the need to bring a form that exists two-dimensionally into three dimensions as Barrett has done in several instances where a painting has inspired its 3-D brethren — as in the toy cars and planes — or vice versa when a found object or thrift-store find is fitted together both sculpturally and on canvas.
Steam Punked: The Surrender of Horse Power (model) - Bret Barrett
Curiosity is good. They say necessity is the mother of invention. Do Barrett’s works predict a future that may be or are they to be solely appreciated for their incredible and richly painted surfaces of bizarre animals and aging modes of transportation? My only regret, and it is a small one, is I had hoped Barrett’s maiden voyage would carry me a bit further and closer to my destination than what his gas-guzzling predecessors have done thus far, if not at least, in my mind.
The Art of Framing Gallery
3333 Adams Avenue
San Diego, CA 92116
619.563.9770
http://theartofframing.net
IMPORTANT!! exhibit on view through September 17 only
Bottle-Nose Jet - Bret Barrett
Tall Sail Lizard - Bret Barrett
Reptilian Swashbuckler - Tall Sail Lizard (models) - Bret Barrett


Comments
"What sets these artists apart from say a Matt Stallings is that they can paint — truly paint."
!!
-- I don't understand what this means. I spoke to Bret and we both think quite highly of Matt's Stallings work. That guy can paint.
!?
Posted by: Dark Vomit | septembre 14, 2009 11:27 PM
Thanks for commenting Kelly. Stallings can paint but not to the extent that you or Bret can. It's all surface with Stallings - stencils, spraypaint, pastel colors etc. etc. - the imagery is as slick and as packaged as the Pop idols its worshipping. There is no depth to the paint handling or subject matter. In my opinion...
Posted by: Kevin Freitas | septembre 15, 2009 07:31 AM
Posted by: RG | septembre 17, 2009 12:38 PM
Barrett's work comes across as full of delight and some mischief. I'm sorry it closed today since I didn't get a chance to see it. The sensiblity reminded me of Jean Tinguely, a Swiss artist from the early to mid 1900's. There is a museum of his work in Basel, well worth the trip if one is in Europe. http://www.tinguely.ch/en/museum/index.html
I agree, Kevin, that not everyone that paints uses paint with an understanding that it is not just about putting down color. Exploiting the rich possibilities of paint takes time - something many are not willing to give.
Posted by: Marilyn Mitchell | septembre 17, 2009 08:44 PM
Matt Stallings uses more unconventional painting techniques to create his own unique look. Bret, Vomit and I apply more traditional painting techniques. What Matt does is nothing less, it’s just different. I think the comparison is unfair.
Bret hit it out of the park with this show. It’s apparent that he put a lot of thought and care in every detail. I have always been into Bret’s art since I started showing with him but after this show I have a more profound respect for the work.
Keep up the good work Bret (& Matt).
Posted by: Paul Brogden | septembre 22, 2009 12:47 AM
Kevin,
Regarding dreams and art:
As the memory of 20th century modernism continues to fade it seems like the archaic power of art may be set for a comeback (did it ever really go away?) Last Sunday's NY Times magazine ran a cover story about the publication of Carl Jung's Red Book, a highly personal journal (highly personal as in never intended for publication) that he filled with descriptions and paintings of his dreams recorded at a time when he was undergoing something of a crisis in his life. Jung himself was skeptical that the clinical community would accept his radical departure from scientific method in favor of a Dantesque journey into the messy workings of his own unconscious. And he was right. Yet he took the plunge anyway and in the process boosted his own reputation as a radical thinker.
Which brings me back to art, shamanism and Bret Barrett. Is it possible to be an artist without at the same time being something of a shaman? Or a bodhisatva? Or a clairvoyant? Or a visionary? Let me not belabor the point. But I think I'd have to say no.
Posted by: Perry V | septembre 23, 2009 09:58 PM
Perry's post begs a big question for me (which I pose to fellow readers):
Do you ever dream of being in a gallery or museum and seeing an entire show of really strong work, but when you wake up you realize the work in the dream was nothing like anything you've ever seen in waking life?
This happens to me about 2-3 times a year, and I was wondering if it ever happens to anybody else.
I've never felt the urge to try and duplicate this dream work in real life, because while it was good (and by real life standards, not just in the dream) it has always felt like someone else's work, not mine.
Posted by: RG | septembre 24, 2009 11:40 AM