What San Diego Wants in the Arts
by Kevin Freitas and Patricia Frischer
The following is an overview of 40 Movers and Shakers answers to, and our commentary on, the following question: "What is your vision for the visual arts in San Diego?" We've broken down the most popular responses under eight general headings. It should be noted that this isn't an exhaustive list of the Movers and Shakers who live and work in San Diego, and you'll certainly know of someone who was left out, though not intentionally. There was a certain amount of serendipity involved in the publication of this survey, as Patricia and I later discovered, we we're both concocting our own private versions secretly. Patricia, as one of the Movers and Shakers committee members, along with Patricia Smith - Debbie Linn - Denise Bonaimo - Mireille Des Rosiers - Dennis Paul Batt - Rosemary KimBal - Kaarin Vaughn, is represented in this exhibit of portraiture along with myself. I have over the past year or so, been involved in other projects organized by Patricia, and hope to continue to do so.
Thus, in the spirit of collaboration, and as something San Diegans wanted to see more of, we decided to put our collective minds where are collective hearts are and make those visions a reality. Acknowledging that they exist, helps us obtain them that much quicker. Kevin Freitas


It turns out we got more than we bargained for when we asked forty Movers and Shakers, “What is your vision for the visual arts in San Diego?” They gave a pretty precise view of their particular aspirations, seen by us as a larger reflection on what exists here already and what is ultimately needed.
This included more public art, increased exposure for local artists and sales, more galleries and cultural art centers. Is it worth taking a closer look at what direction we want to take? Which of the following topics below needs to occur first, to break the log jam leading to a healthier art scene? We decided to find out by commenting on these flashes of the future.
Collaborations between art activists and exhibition venues are needed to travel some of our best curated shows within the county and across the border into Tijuana. Ultimately these shows could be seen statewide, nationwide even worldwide. In turn, exhibitions from other contemporary art institutions from across the land, should be scheduled into the programming here. We understand that there are many potential constraints to this type of collaboration working efficiently. Some are budgetary; some are the contrasting visions and agendas for each institution, lead times, manpower, interest, and let’s face it, a bit of apathy. Meaning the proverbial art pie, speaking of only San Diego, has been cut up and there is no more to go around. Why share? Given that everyone has their slice now and is trying to promote it as the best tasting pie in town, to the public who is doing the tasting, it all just sort of tastes the same. If we are limited by the current resources we have, why not cater to the strengths of each institution, letting them specialize in their own field of expertise, which would allow them to work closer and share resources with like minded parties. Each city has there own arts council or commission but they are constantly re-inventing the wheel to get projects done. Couldn’t there at least be a local association of city art councils or an association of art galleries like the association of art museums? This would also help the general public know where to go to get the flavor they desire.
Artists have been adapting to the spirit of collaboration with one another for decades now, certainly online social networking and image reproduction in all formats has helped. Galleries are starting to come around but their financial capabilities are often limited –traveling shows are expensive – but their biggest problem might be the illusion that they have what everyone wants, their artists and mailing list. Collaborations are only as good as a participant’s willingness to achieve the same goal in the spirit of healthy compromise with her collaborator. Collaborations also work well for press promotions showing the strength of the visual arts to the community at large. Isn’t this what we want to ultimately portray, strength in numbers? One for all, all for one.
“I would like to see…. a synergy between arts organizations, groups, artists…. There should be a general willingness to take risks.” - Catherine Sass (Port Of San Diego)
Galleries and Museums are only viable with support from artists, the public, and a strong collecting population. Major collectors are the back bone of our museum boards, but what we also need is fields of grass roots buyers who learn that owning original art adds a tremendous value to the quality of their lives. As for galleries, more of them mean larger amounts of artwork shown. With encouragement and a little competitive spirit, artists are pushed to do their best work and we benefit from a higher level of quality as the bar is raised.
We often take for granted, the role of the artist in society – portrayed somewhat as an outcast, or a bit farfelu if you will – but they are the sole entity responsible for art’s production and economic viability. They are the producer of goods that allow all of us who work in this field to keep on doing what we love so much. How those goods are then distributed, is of course dependent on galleries and museums. While it is not often clear as to who benefits more from this “marriage” of convenience and necessity, the fact remains, if one of them fails, they both fail. Be careful what you wish for Mr. Davies, your first two wishes could also be within your command.
“I would wish to see San Diego become home to a greater number of significant artists due to having more exhibition opportunities, more collectors, and more commercial galleries.” - Hugh Davies (Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego)
Collectors and Community dialogue supply that vital commodity: feedback. For example, collectors buy, giving reinforcement to artists. And emerging artists can be mentored by established artists. An active community arts voice insures success by dissemination of information in the form of printed media and Internet resources such as SDVAN. SDVAN is founded on the principal of encouraging these exchanges and is starting a new feature, Picked RAW Peeled which will reveal artistic events in more detail. Too, the mushrooming of Collector clubs all over San Diego can build a larger social network with peer education in the arts at the same time support artists monetarily and proudly.
We like to think that everyone is a collector of something, whether it is stories or art. We also believe that there is a difference between the notion that individuals with “money” are also the same individuals “with money who buy art” or somehow, that they should be the same. There’s no accounting for taste obviously and if you stand in a gallery long enough, something will get sold. But that isn’t the point. The goal is to provide access to many types of art, in all different price ranges, that allow the connoisseurs as well as the amateurs, to pick and choose freely. The objective, for those of us whose job it is to provide this access, is as the critic Arthur C. Danto points out, “That is what education is in art. Helping people find their way. It is [rather] explaining why each work is good in its own way.” Collectors are educated in the art of looking and are only motivated to buy, when the artist has done her job of making work that is good.
Finally, feedback is vital, it is crucial, so is showing support for each other’s endeavors. Recognize the past, but move forward. Talk to everyone, “introduce yourself as Delacroix and hand them your wet brushes” as Larry Rivers use to jokingly say, don’t be afraid to let people in on the artistic process, your fears, your joys, and your art. Dialoguing is for life.
“Influential people need to be educated in the process of purchasing art, actively.” - Gustav Rooth (Planet Rooth)
“…a future with….card carrying collectors with ID that states "I belong, I buy art, do you?" - Kevin Freitas (ArtasAuthority)
“If I could make two changes favorable to the visual arts in San Diego, one would be to have more venues, commercial and otherwise, so the numerous talented artists in the region would have ample opportunities to exhibit; the other, to have more intelligent writing about these artists and their work.” - Robert Pincus (The San Diego Union-Tribune and Sign-On San Diego)
Art Fairs like the one in Miami/Basel could become a standard feature on our events calendar. Ann Berchtold wants to work with our neighbors north and south and hopes especially to promote emerging artists in the first years of the fair. Most major cities have their own annual art fairs, the closest to us, is our friendly neighbor to the north L.A. Why not here in San Diego? We’re afraid that the answer to this is a varied as the logistics and investment it would take to create it. Is it possible we think so; perhaps a look at the success of Comic-Con might give us some clues? Is it for tomorrow or on next year’s cultural agenda, probably not, but efforts are in the works as witnessed by Berchtold’s commitment. It will certainly take more than a strong commitment as one of the first goals would be to establish an infrastructure, capable of supporting such an event. This would of course entail some major political and financial decisions. Many European countries have “sister” cities that enable them to exchange talent and culture on many different platforms from music to the arts to theater. Perhaps San Diego can “host” and vice versa be “guests” in collaboration with another country or for logistical sake, another State here in the U.S. Sending some of our talented artists to the many Biennials would also encourage an outside appreciation of our artistic production, proving that we have the depth to hang with the big boys.
“Launch a successful contemporary art fair in San Diego that becomes a catalyst to encourage collecting art, showcases this cities art institutions and artists, and promotes international cultural tourism.” - Ann Berchtold (Beyond the Borders Art Fair)
Youth and Education are fundamental. Teaching art as parents and volunteers, in most public schools, makes it obvious that we need a consistent and comprehensive arts education curriculum for every institution. Go talk to your son or daughter's Principal now or write a letter to your school's Superintendent, asking for more art. It seems the real issues we’re all facing, is the simple question of who’s going to pay, and if it’s going to be you and us as taxpayers, what are we willing to pay for? And do we have a choice? It is a debate that our attempts even to address it here in a few paragraphs, is much too ineffective. We as a country for the most part, universally accept the idea that the basics in school are necessary – reading, writing and arithmetic – but also know that the human spirit and mind is capable of much more, in fact, it craves more. Art in essence is not a luxury, it is a necessity of the human species that will manifest itself in a multitude of ways, not always under the heading of art, but which is as creative, just, and a much needed nourishment for the soul. Creativity knows no unemployment and will always find work.
"Start with art education in the schools for life enhancement and future support of the arts in the community." - Ellen Phelan (Art activist, educator, and contemporary art collector)
Public Art created a general consensus amongst the Movers and Shakers that was heard loud and clear. San Diego needs more of it. There was a slightly higher demand to integrate art and artists into any future city planning or development. We like the idea, mentioned more than once, to have temporary outdoor public sculptures placed throughout the city. Rotating them out as new ones come in would be stimulating, exciting, and opens up the possibility for fresher stronger works. We applaud April Game’s placement of sculptures in Quail Gardens as a step in the right direction.
Though we did not ask for the state of Public Art in San Diego as it currently exists, interestingly enough, there was hardly a mention of what is here in public art already, notably downtown, at UCSD, and on the waterfront. If the vision is to have more, does this mean that there is not enough? What is there to be learned in the statement, “I would like to see more public art.” What is it about public art that creates this desire or repulsion in some cases, and leaves its public wanting more of it? It is difficult to know perhaps, how cost effective public sculpture is and how much interest it truly generates. If like Miami/Basel, we were looking for a model for an art fair; than we believe Chicago would be the model to base our own public sculpture program upon. Let it be known, Mayoral influence, money, and manpower, is nine-tenths responsible for the building of Millennium Park. It is also what Chicagoans are most proud of, beside their baseball.
"I would create a plan with the City of San Diego to integrate local art and artists as well as non indigenous artists into every aspect of public design as well as part of the chamber of commerce.” – Debra Poteet (Collector)
Studios and Housing is a county wide issue. Only three people thought artists could benefit from more affordable housing and studio space. It is probably safe to say, not just artists, but anyone living and renting within the county of San Diego could use less expensive housing. In the end, you still have to make the art no matter how big the loft is. So, the question is, does every artist need a studio these days? Not likely. A better use of space might be collective work/live centers or cultural centers, like the one San Diego’s Monica Hoover is working on, located in the former Wonder Bread factory (Ballpark District), or the LUX Institute amongst others. Besides, what are the chances of a perfect storm in the form of the blustery days of SoHo with Johns living above Rauschenberg, heated debates about painting at the Cedar Tavern, and blockbuster exhibits at Leo Castelli, ever coalescing in 2008 let alone in San Diego? This is not criticism, it is about the potential and the physical territory and the boundaries of studio space, where artists have chosen to live. The galleries, and even the art supply stores, are too scattered to warrant the need of a larger supportive structure. The closest we’ve come to a discernable degree of synergy, is in North Park.
“Through Synergy Art Foundation's Barrio Logan/East Village Arts District (Believe Project), we hope to provide local artists with work/live spaces, a cultural center, exhibition/workshop space, and the ability to unify and support our visual arts community. The ultimate goal is to establish San Diego as a vital international cultural destination." - Naomi Bianca Nussbaum (Director, Synergy Arts Foundation and the BL/EV Project)
$$$$ Everyone wants it, but artists and the people whose support they depend on, hardly get any. One way to encourage creativity and less dependency on the good will of others, is to stop bartering for services and goods when putting on shows and productions and pay for it, if you’re doing the inviting. Artists are as guilty as anyone else in this exchange of free commerce and often end up the victims, giving up time and money for a “free” show and a line on their resume. A more proactive stance would be to increase local public and private grants and funding, City and local government philanthropy, create small business loans for galleries, and the buying of art. It just might do the trick. Let’s stop thinking of art as a charity and remember it has great value. We are not looking for a handout from others; we are looking for the same basic economic structure that allows millions of Americans to go to work everyday and eventually allows them to retire.
“Diversity of art in both media and style and the democratic selection of art are the best ways to regain public faith and improve finance in the art world. This would enhance the lives of artists, improve the financial viability and ensure growth of art institutions and museums, and greatly improve the public's perception of the art world." – Dennis Paul Batt (Executive Director, San Diego Visual Artists Guild)
Finally, a special award is given to Jean Lowe (SD Art Prize Ist year winner), for her cheerleading efforts and support: “San Diego has a really energetic and interesting art scene--it just needs to believe it!!”
The answer in the end might be just a question of confidence.
You can see the Movers and Shakers show in person from Sept. 5 until Oct. 4, presented by San Diego Visual Arts Network and Art Expressions Gallery: 2645 Financial Court, Suite C, San Diego, CA 92117 Exhibition hours: Monday - Friday 9am-5pm, Saturday 10am-5pm
More info: Patricia Frischer 760.943.0148 or Patricia Smith 858.270.7577


Comments
Spacecraft Gallery presents:
John Chwekun - Unions
Opening: Saturday, September 13th 6pm to 9pm
September 13th - October 6th, 2008
Posted by: puzio | août 26, 2008 05:05 PM
Fringe dweller; yep, that would be me. When I dropped out of formal high school, I ended up getting a GED. I was making art outside of any formal setting; a system of geography (Jasper Johns in South Carolina, Lou Reed's song "small town") Then I went onto Appalachian State via an upward bound program, which I eventualy flunked out of because of partying too much. I attended one art history class at that point but the class was so wrapped up into memorization that I was too stoned to cope. I was still making art at that time, but again outside of any formal help. I eventualy moved to Asheville after getting into a museum show (juried) and meeting other artists from Asheville, who had been formally trained. Upon being in Asheville I was a constant fixture at these artists’ hangouts. I finally felt that I was connected with a community that I could relate to. These artists also represented any connections that I might be able to make for purpose of exhibition. Over a period of time I developed as a painter and started getting shows in Charlotte and other regional areas.
Every now and then the Asheville Museum would hold a juried show for regional artist’s. I got into this show and was looking forward to the opening. Artists that had been accepted into the Asheville Museum juried show came from all points of North and South Carolina to find that the doors were lock and the opening had been rescheduled; without any notice to the participants. Needless to say this really pissed me off and my fellow local artists. In response we organized the Asheville Ad Hoc Art workers Union and protested outside of the museum. Our objective was to make the museum reveal their mission statement for local/regional artists; noting that state funding required local outreach program for cultivating local art. Even at that point I saw a connection with the museum and the local university. Grad students were getting more focus than most local artists. The museum eventually gave the Ad Hoc Art Workers a forum to discuss these issues and the outcome was the opportunity to curate (pacify) one of there shows; which ended up being an invitational group show for regional artists. The museum paid all expenses for travel (visits of regional artists’ studios) and the U Haul to pick up the work. We could have never been able to get that kind of notice without a collective effort. I eventual went back into college (Montreat Business College) which was a spa program for adult and got my BBA; another fringe move on my part; The factory that I was working for paid 100% of the tuition. After graduating and divorce I moved to San Diego and then shortly afterwards I got into the Vermont Program; which is another fringe opportunity if we compare the level of cronyism that most traditional grad school represents. Most of the connections I have made post VT have been through our fellow alumni and not through a system of networking of faculty/administration.
Being in San Diego I go to all the establish galleries and they are filled with work from alumni of UCSD and San Diego State. These colleges seem to be farm schools for area galleries. I’m (speaking as an outsider) sure this is consistent throughout the art world. I’m glad we have this forum to voice opinions and I’m glad that, because of this type of forum the two “critics” don't have the last word. I highly encourage anyone who might see a given exhibit within this region to write in and give their opinion in spite of their fringe position.
Posted by: Larry Caveney | août 29, 2008 04:49 PM
Artwork from the workplace
Category: Exhibition Opportunities
Posted by: Garage Gallery
Deadline: 12/30/08
Art/Works Art from the work place is a curated exhibit based on art work made in the course of your day or night job. Please send information on process and jpegs deepseal2@aol.com
"Indians often used the laws, practices, and representations that were imposed on them by force or by fascination to ends other than those of conquerors; they made something else out of them; they subverted them from within-not by rejecting them or by transforming them."
Michel de Certeau
Posted by: Larry Caveney | août 29, 2008 05:08 PM
Larry,
thank you for your comment and letting us in on your artistic parcour - fascinating. You touch on quite a few things that merit a larger discussion, and I hope some others will jump in to broaden the subject.
I'll start by saying that I'm not sure being on the fringe is obviously a good thing. It's not a badge of courage that should be worn proudly on our lapels, nor is it a "space" or mind-set, attitude, belief etc., in my opinion, that is very beneficial to making art. Being or living on the fringe, choosing to, doesn't make the art any better, anymore than being on the inside of a group does. It feels awfully simplistic what I'm saying I know, but I think being on the fringe or that feeling of alienation or exclusion, at least in the art world, is often self-imposed because we believe that other "higher up" powers control our future and the possibility of entering through the gate. I don't think they do or that those powers exist.
As for critics having the last word, here is something by the art critic JJ Charlesworth: "Criticism in periods of certainty works to elaborate the authority of its terms; in a period of crisis, criticism can become the space in which conflicting terms are explicitly articulated. But such outcomes are today limited by the exhausted culture of low expectations that dominates cultural and political life."
Are we in a bit of a crisis here in San Diego, maybe so, I guess it depends on your "position" within its cultural boundaries. So yes, more people need to write in and give their opinions - not necessairly from the fringe - but from the point of view that they're turning those opinions into actions. Writing about art is good, but only if it can raise those low expectations, otherwise, it remains trivial.
Posted by: Kevin Freitas | août 29, 2008 10:04 PM
Thank you Kevin for those considered words and I hope others will offer up views on isolation within our art community.
"In becoming socialized, the struggle against the blind domination of nature triumphed inasmuch as it gradually assimilated primitive, natural alienation, but in another form. Alienation became social in the fight against natural alienation. Is it by chance that a technological civilization has developed to such a point that social alienation has been revealed by its conflict with the last areas of natural resistance that technological power hadn’t managed (for good reason) to subjugate?"
Rauol Vaneigem
Rauol Vaneigem is speaking about how mankind has worked so hard in isolating (with technologies) nature from civilization that the processes of this effort has become part of our psychology and has carried over to our day to day lives in how we interact with each other. This action of separation within cultures (class, race, gender) has created social divisions. Our society creates barriers between people in a variety of ways; this is the creation of the fringe. Some people are forced into isolation, such as some homeless citizens that are forced out of their residences, or are victims of spousal abuse. Some people isolate themselves from others based on their fears of others and out of a desire to preserve their wealth or ideologies.
Some of the citizens on the list below are isolated by their own wealth and comfort zones and have no notion of the state of their own communities. This is a very subversive type of isolation because it is self-imposed and cannot be clearly defined because the victims have surrounded themselves in a safe retreat of comfort. One example of this type of isolation are citizens that live in gated communities.
Victims of Social Isolation
Elderly women
Sanitation workers
Homeless citizens
Drug addicts
Bankers
Politicians
Black African Americans
Folk singers
Plant workers
Immigration workers
Teachers
Models
Presidents
CEOs
Appalachian citizens
Hotel Managers
Hookers
Pimps
Gamblers
Church folk
Family
Musicians
Poets
Lawyers
Teenagers
Girls
Boys
Scouts
Carnival ride attendants
Bus riders
Limo drivers
Grave diggers
Africa
Newland, North Carolina
Small businesses and Jockeys
Tom Waits
Iraq
San Diego Zoo
Animals
My brother who lives in Heaton, NC
The person at the 24hour Fitness
24 Hour fitness
THE DMV
Courthouses
Some bars
Gays
Illegal migrants
Posted by: Larry Caveney | août 30, 2008 07:51 AM
During the last few years a new set of assumptions about the role of the artist has emerged in the United States as part of what is being called the “new public art.” (1) This new genre of public art, according to critic Suzi Gablik, “takes the form of interactive, community-based projects inspired by social issues.” (2) In fact, the new public art might be more accurately termed the new community art because the questions raised by the interaction of the artist and particular, urban communities have played a central role in its evolution.
Further, this work tends to be less concerned with producing objects per se than with the process of collaboration, which is understood to produce certain pedagogical effects in and on the community. In this way the new community-based public art represents a transition from an earlier model of public art that involved the location of sculptural works in sites administered by public agencies- either federal, state, or local governments or other administrative bodies (airports, parks, etc.)- or alternately, private locations (for example, some of the works in the “New Urban Landscape” exhibition at the World Financial Center in Battery Park City in 1988).
Posted by: Larry Caveney | août 30, 2008 09:12 AM
One way of beating the "fringe," noting that's there no ignoring it.
It's called the "Draw Me Series"
The idea of the “Draw Me Series” is to create exchange amongst strangers by using the simple model of portraiture. This piece is intended to bridge those boundaries between strangers. I have offered this collaborative intervention to many people across the country and world through the use of Craig’s list.. After I receive 100 participants/authors I will seek out publishers. Upon publishing, any proceeds will be redistributed back out to the collaborators/authors. Here is a brief breakdown of the process:
This is a conceptual piece that evolves many elements of form and content. Here are the steps:
1. You will need a sketch pad and drawing pencils. A camera of some sort.
2. Meet someone that you are not familiar with and allow them to draw your portrait.
3. Then write about the transaction (one page doubled space)
4. Photograph the performance (have a third party take the picture)
5. Bring back the following: Drawing, Photo, Narrative (one doubled spaced page)
The collection is more of reflection of authorship than it is representation. The collection of information will be formatted into a coffee table book.
Posted by: Larry Caveney | août 30, 2008 09:51 AM
Another fringe dweller…
I teach History of Modern Art. Students in this class are put to the task of simulating artists styles and process by using their own design techniques (game art, graphic design, interior design) Today I had a student (Iris from history of modern art class) who created a “Happening” (Allen Kaprow) within her own definition. She positioned herself within a parking lot; with the use of her boyfriend (a broker with little prior knowledge of art history) was given paint, brush and canvas to recreate a Jackson Pollock through her verbal instructions; as passersby observed. Iris in her own right was just introduced to Pollock’s work the day prior; so her knowledge of the given artist was limited as well. Iris commented on how differently her boy (within his posture on the payment) looked compared to his normal day to day persona. I thought it was a beautiful piece (heartfelt emotional response) in the context of a relational aesthetic (sharing a new experience with her mate) and playing on the idea of the “void”. The relational aesthetic in this work is about using the form of painting (Not about painting in its own right) to bridge an isolated point between the two (Iris and boyfriend). The “void” was amplified by their lack of knowledge.
Another approach to this piece could happen (happening) with asking the passersby for information on Jackson Pollock; allowing strangers to inform the process/piece.
Posted by: Larry Caveney | septembre 5, 2008 12:41 PM