« février 2006 | main.jpg | avril 2006 »

mars 31, 2006

Galerie Soustraction - Révélation du Poteau Rose

soustractionSm.jpgSome facts for your viewing pleasure: This was a gallery invitation to an opening that I created, albeit a FAKE one, that I printed and (e)mailed to a number of galleries, newspapers, art magazines and critics in Belgium and abroad. Soustraction in French means subtraction and the asbl that follows the gallery's name stands for Association Sans But Lucratif - or what we call here in the States, Non-for-profit. The cast of characters listed on the invitation were all recognized artists, patrons of the arts or Ministers of Education and Culture. They were obviously known and respected public figures in Belgium, and perhaps a little less so in other parts of the world. Didier Vermeiren was and still is, a Belgian artist/sculptor. Viviane Reding was a member of the European Commission in charge of Education and Culture. S.E. Jean-Jaques Kasel was the Ambassador to Luxembourg. Corrine De Parmentier was the Mayor of Forest, an affluent neighborhood outside of Brussels. And finally, Claude Lorent was a critic for Le Palais des Beaux-arts magazine and La Libre Belgique newspaper.

You might be questioning the motive behind such a stunt by now, and I'll try to answer that by putting the idea into an art political context going on at this time in Brussels. I believe that almost always, it's better to question than not to speak at all.

View the gallery invitation

Belgium was a tough place for a lot of artists and galleries, to work and exhibit. There were of course, a select few who did manage to carve out an exsitence and make a valuable contribution to the art scene. However, unlike the gallery system here in the U.S., a majority of the galleries in Belgium and in Europe in general receive funding (in part) from local, State and governmental agencies. The tendancy is to create an ASBL that allows its owner - I refrain from using dealer in its most purest commercial sense, as it is hard to apply this label to the individual or group of individuals, artists, entrepreneurs, critics or thrill seeker, looking to exhibit. To put it another way, there was a profound belief in the flexibility and freedom allowed in the choices in who and what to exhibit, when you didn't have to worry too much about next month's rent. Risks could be taken without risking the shirt off your back. The goal wasn't wasn't necessairly to 'make money' though you could 'sell' as much as you wanted, you just couldn't enrich yourself personally - any profits made beyond your monthly expenses, saleries etc. were used for the gallery's continued operations. Some asbl's started as galleries and eventually created their own foundation that evolved into full fledged museums. Atelier 340 Muzeum is a prime example of individual and governmental funding, drawing from both the French and Dutch institutions for support, that has become an important cultural landmark in Brussels. Local community and town cultural centers, offering a wide range of music, theater, dance etc. are still quite popular within the diverse cultural landscape.

Having lived in Brussels for several years, I started to understand the complex social and political climate that reigns there and the "duality" of everything - it's like having a twin brother and sister living under the same roof. The city of Brussels was linguistically, politically and culturally "divided" with representatives in both houses, so to speak, that governed life in Belgium. Roughly, the geographics were anything NE of Brussels was Dutch and anything SW was French, the capitol itself was approximately half & half as well. As you probably know, Belgium is not a very large country. If I had to guess, it would probably be the size of North or South Carolina. This didn't always make for an abundance of choice or opportunities, and culturally speaking, it made the availability of certain gallery, museum, curatorial and directorships extremely limited and extremely politicized. Not to mention a healthy dose of competition between Dutch and French institutions, its artists and their critics. For every MCA in say french Charleroi, there was its equivalent MCA in dutch Antwerp, each vying for the public's attention.

The upside to this heady competition was that there was always something new being exhibited in galleries and museums, and the quality and interest was relatively high. The downside was that once a position was coveted, it was rarely given up and became in action and vision, a certain personal demagoguery of taste, influence and power. As in the majority of artistic circles, if you weren't in, you were out. This is where the gallery invitation came into play.

The invitation was not a criticism per se of the art being made in Belgium, but a response to the methods and tools being used to promote it and in some cases, to sell it. The fact that I used real names on the invitation, sampled from other gallery invitations and museum shows, lent only a certain credibility to the invitation that many people responded positively to overlooking the obvious "red herrings" in its presentation. It was a "best of" invitation, a collage of ideas and art work brought together under one institution that didn't exist, and only existed in the imagination of the invited guest. By distancing in effect through the use of "recognized" institutions and/or individuals, buzzwords if you will, the image of what it was representing and in reality what was being shown - the supposed art work, it was clear that the emphasis was on the packaging - the "look" and not the art. At this point, at least for me, it was more about hear say and gossip than any actual interest in the artists work or for that matter, the quality of what was being shown. The political jockeying and the power of decision and choosing being done amongst its gallery and museum directors and their disciples, was often at the expense and choice of the art and artist. If we all lived in a perfect world, things would be different I know, but it is less about playing fair and who deserves to be shown or not; but how easily corrupted one can become given a not so altruistic personal vision and the supposed freedom to exercise it in. Art can become at times, a rather large security blanket covering a myriad of ills and good fortune.

mars 27, 2006

This is not a pipe OR a lesson in Belge, almost

Ceci.jpg
Mark Hayward (U.S.A.) installation, Abel Joseph Gallery: La cage aux ours, Schaerbeek, Brussels

The lesson: Ceci est une PIPE



Magritte - La trahison des images.JPG

René Magritte - from La trahison des images

The lesson: Ceci n'est pas une PIPE




Wim Delvoye.jpg

Wim Delvoye - Belgian artist

The lesson: Tailler une PIPE




manet - Le joueur du fifre.jpg

Edouard Manet - Le joueur du fifre

The lesson: C'est du PIPOT !!




Peep show.jpg

Le Supermarché du PEEP

The lesson: What you can't see, won't hurt you.




Garcon a la pipe.jpg

Pablo Picasso - Garçon à la pipe

The lesson: A Rose by any other name would be $104.2 million to be exact.

mars 24, 2006

Pet Spaces

Michael.jpg


Flirty.jpg


Michael Arata lives and works in L.A.

mars 21, 2006

aperçu, Part II - Un Printemps pour la Tossé

Hervé.jpg

EXPO
50 Têtes réfléchissantes et 10 photographies
Du 25 Mars[March] au 17 Avril[April] 2006 à Tourcoing, France

Un Printemps pour la Tossé
Hervé Crespel
Hervé's Blog

affiche.jpg


New works by Hervé Crespel
Hervé works and lives in Brussel, Belgium. Teaches at the Ecole Supérieur d’art Appliqué et Textile, Roubaix, France.

Caisse 13-19.jpg

Caisse 20-27.jpg

Tête N°1.jpg

Tête N°2.jpg

Tête N°3.jpg

Tête N°4.jpg

Tête N°5.jpg

Tête N°6.jpg

Tête N°7.jpg

Tête N°8.jpg

Tête N°9.jpg

Tête N°10.jpg

Tête N°11.jpg

Tête N°12.jpg





email.jpg email Hervé Crespel

WAR, Part II

3.jpgyear anniversary of the war in Iraq, some prefer to see it as the three year anniversary of the Liberation of the Iraqi peuple, others still would prefer not to have seen it all – war that is. A civil war now in the making?, this apparently remains to be seen or announced officially, by the US government. With 30,000 Iraqi civilians (dead) since the liberation started in March of 2003 and 2,500 coalition forces (killed), it is indeed difficult to see the light at the end of the tunnel and not the end of a long barrel pointed in your direction. Alas, this is war we’ve been told and lives we’ll be lost and sacrifices made. The President has promised to protect Americans at home and abroad [against terrorism], his number #1 priority and the thing that keeps him up at night. He has a plan and a strategy he says, otherwise he wouldn’t have put the troops in harms way. And so do we as artists, here at home and abroad, have a strategy? a plan of attack? to counter, to protest the spread of a Trojan Horse Democracy, put upon other foreign nations for the good and the ills of each country in the hopes of global peace and the end to terrorism?

Or as artists, do we really need to be concerned with all of this? Not our job, not our responsibility, we just make art you might be thinking. Isn’t that enough you might be wondering. Irving Petlin and Mark di Suvero didn’t think it was enough in 1966, midway into the fight for Vietnam, them and 418 other artists who contributed art works to the Peace Tower in protest of an escalating and seemingly un-winnable war. Does this mean that artists today have lost a political or social voice they once had – forty years later? Has it been reduced to a faint whisper that no one hears or cares to hear? Or are we just content with ourselves to fight it out on canvas or paper, satisfied to exhibit our works of art in galleries and museums? Do we have time to fight, the money to fight with or the experience to carry it through? What was the revolution across the globe in ’68, of civil and human rights, racial equality, a woman’s right to vote, a need and a time for change – is now?, Hummers and cell phones, studios downtown and Art Expo. Pessimism? I don’t believe so, just perhaps a notable softening of a current reality and lifestyle. I question the relevancy and importance of the artist’s role, his/her voice and its need to be seen, heard and understood in a time of war.

Specifically, I wonder about the relationship and relevancy of the new Peace Tower to these current political times and the war in Iraq. I had this same reflection of thought when I recently read a review of 7 or 8 “updated” performances, several months ago at the Guggenheim Museum by Marina Abramović. Marina had re-done a series of performances in the sanctity of the Guggenheim that were originally performed several decades earlier by artists such as Vito Acconci (Seed Bed), Bruce Nauman and even an earlier performance of hers. It’s as if there is this current tendency, a longing for the good ‘ol days when life was simpler and everyone had a cause, to re-do, re-live, re-experience the thrill of those heady revolutionary times through show and tell, and instruct a whole new generation of oblivious converts or roadside hawkers in how to see the light that once shined so glaringly. Just how much “Satisfaction” do the Rolling Stones or anyone else for that matter, need before they become as expendable as any non-recyclable throwaway. What I question the most is not so much the content of either Marina’s performances or Petlin’s new tower, but the context and physical place(ment) of both and the message it sends out – text messaging not withstanding.

If you’re a newcomer to the art scene or a younger artist just starting out, you might see these events as new and refreshing, avant garde to say the least, but they’re not, at least not today stripped of their original context and meaning, their original desire and lust for life, their inherent truth(s). They’re simply safe. Lukewarm. Commercialized. By products. Exploitable. You can’t help to make comparisons between the original ACT and its diluted half-sister. You can’t help to make comparisons between the violence in Iraq, Afghanistan, Somali and other forsaken territories, and the porntificating - my made-up word – of face value shock and frontal nudity before a group of blasé museum or gallery goers already primed for the event. Have we gotten to the point where the piece makes the ARTIST and only the most respected brand name artists will suffice regardless of what they’ve done already? Is if it was good then, it must still be good now, still à-propos nowadays? Since when does being a classic become a substitute for a lack of quality and substance?

Why the hell didn’t Petlin, di Suvero and Tiravanija rent some abandoned dirt covered lot in Ohio, where the highest mortality rate of American soldiers thus far fighting in the Iraq war come from – where there is almost always a funeral once or twice a week – to erect their new Peace Tower, instead of building it in front of the Whitney Museum of Art in New York? Why? Was it for exposure?, for Peace?, the blessing from a recognized American Institution?, for $$$ ?, out of boredom? Eat what you kill takes on new meaning when standing holding a placard in the museum’s cafeteria. Why does it smack of public Sculpture and not public Protest? And finally, how much risk is involved this time around for the contributing artists in donating their works? Can Nancy Spero, James Rosenquist, Hans Haacke amongst others, truly consider they’re making a sacrifice for the good of the cause? How much effort does it really take for them to donate a little something from the back of their studios? But most importantly, will these works of art be auctioned off like their predecessors’ works were to help continue the fight against, this time, the war in Iraq? Somehow, I just don’t see an American Institution such as the Whitney, purveyor of taste in Contemporary art and the infamous Biennial, donate proceeds to an anti-war movement. That they recognize the importance of debate is one thing, to jeopardize any government funding for their continued existence is another. Perhaps we’ll find answers in Tiravanija’s philosophical outlook when he says,

For me, I would like to think that the project is not so much against something, but rather for peace”.

Amen.


Review of the Whitney Biennial 2006 Chicago Tribune You'll need to register first in order to have access to the article - it's FREE. Or contact me, I'll send you a copy. Art as Authority

Excerpt from Christopher Knight's article:

The biggest groaner is Rirkrit Tiravanija's restaging of Mark di Suvero's 1966 Artist's Tower for Peace. The original Constructivist-style tower, a grass-roots Vietnam War protest, was erected in Los Angeles on a vacant where hundreds of contributors added 2-foot-square panels registering their political opinions -- sparking a citywide commotion. (A man even got shot.) Rebuilt in the sculpture garden at the Whitney, where it pokes its head up to greet shoppers along Madison Avenue, the once-anarchic public sculpture is tamed like a goat in a petting zoo.

The peace tower is emblematic of the show -- earnest and stale. Having abandoned the Whitney Biennial format without abandoning the Whitney Biennial, the museum has created a no-win solipsism of its own.

Had the museum organized -- separate from the regularly scheduled biennial machine -- a sharp, cogent theme show dissecting imperial U.S. ambitions and taking on an activist role, the exceptional effort might have galvanized attention. Pretending that the best recent art is characterized by international anxiety over an environment of gloom serves no one.

The last time I thoroughly engaged with and enjoyed a Whitney Biennial, the Persian Gulf War had just come to an abrupt end, grunge music was on the horizon and Octavio Paz had recently been awarded the Nobel Prize for literature. It was spring 1991.

mars 17, 2006

15 Minutes or Life Imitates Art

chris.jpgWell, I guess Andy is right afterall. Everyone does get a chance at 15 minutes of fame. I can say this with whole hearted conviction because it happened to me, except that I still have a credit for 14 minutes and 45 seconds coming to me. You might be wondering who this handsome fellow is pictured here, well this is Chris Daughtry from McLeansville, NC and also from American Idol fame. Does he remind you of anyone? No?, well he should. That's me !! Well, sort of, well it's not me really but it sure looks like me. Check it out. Not convinced? well, the other day in the gallery as I was going about my business I had a young couple with two kids say to me as they were heading out the door, "You know, you look a lot like that guy on American Idol". Luckily, I did know of whom they were speaking. I replied, "thank you" blushing a bit around the ears, shyly flustered and embarrassed by my new found (OUT) fame. They left and I was a STAR (rising). If only it had lasted longer, I just purchased a new Sharpie...

mars 13, 2006

WAR, what is it good for? Absolutely NOTHING!

After 300 pages of gallery ads and publicity in a 324 page art revue, it left enough pages for 4 articles of which one was about the “Peace Tower” of 1966. If you haven’t guessed yet which art magazine I’m referring to, I’ll give you a hint: ARTFORUM. $8.00 for an art magazine that is the size and weight of a year end fashion roundup by Vogue. The following is a resume of the article in the March 2006 issue of ARTFORUM entitled Peace Tower - Irving Petlin, Mark di Suvero, and Rirkrit Tiravanija revist The Artists' Tower of Protest, 1966 Introduction by Jeffrey Kastner Photo collage - Charles Brittin, Dan Budnik, Newsweek Magazine


In 1966 “The Artists’ Tower of Protest” – or commonly referred to then as the “Peace Tower” – was erected in a West Hollywood neighbourhood lot at the corner of La Cienega and Sunset Boulevard. According to its founding member, Irving Petlin and the subsequent activist coalition he formed – Artists’ Protest Committee (APC) – the tower was erected as a

galvanizing symbol of dissent aimed at a government whose constant use of force and irresponsible tactics, as an APC broadside charged, undermined the role of international bodies the US had itself helped create, while acting to weaken and make hypocritical our struggle for freedom at home. Jeffrey Kastner, ARTFORUM

The Peace Tower’s builder was Mark di Suvero, the time is the war in Vietnam.

Peace Tower.jpg

Petlin had been living in France (France had had a similar past with the Algerian War of Independence that had recently ended in a cessez-le-feu in 1962 and Algeria’s full Independence, French troops finally left in 1968). Petlin left Paris in 1964 and was in LA the following year organizing a grassroots movement to “discuss the possibility of organizing events that would begin to challenge the (Vietnam) war”. The first meeting was held at the Dawn Gallery and roughly sixty people attended. The APC was formed and their logo became a “diminishing ladder - larger at the bottom than at the top. At the bottom it said STOP, and at the top it said, in smaller letters, ESCALATION”.

A movement was born, it however, remained frustratingly local and Petlin & Co. were looking for larger fish to fry. They decided to picket the RAND Corporation of Santa Monica, Petlin says

where nice liberal academics were doing research, going to galleries and buying art, supporting all the liberal causes, civil rights, and so on.
Much to everyone’s dismay, RAND was actually under contract with the Department of Defense and was developing something called the Protected-Hamlet Concept, which essentially put Vietnamese peasants behind barbed wire fences and declared the rest of their land as a “Free-Fire Zone”. The protest ended with an eventual open public debate between RAND and the APC. Politics being what they are, curiously enough, Robert McNamara then Secretary of Defense under Johnson, OK’d the debate in hopes of better understanding the growing resistance to the war. When all was said and done, there was still little to no exposure from the press for Petlin.

Petlin’s APC then decided to physically make their presence known. Mark di Suvero was having a show during this same time at Dawn, and agreed to design and build a 60 ft. high Peace Tower. APC sent letters to hundreds of artists in LA, the US and abroad asking for works of art – on small 2 ft. x 2 ft. panels – to be exhibited alongside the tower. 418 works of art were received and displayed from the likes of Robert Motherwell, Ad Reinhardt, Elaine de Kooning, Frank Stella, amongst others and survived despite continual night & day harassment and drive by’s, cursing & swearing, physical attacks on the participants and vandalism from the community and local military bases. The Peace Tower stood for three months under constant surveillance and protection from volunteers sympathetic to the fight against the war in Vietnam. After three months, the art works were then auctioned off to raise money and continue the anti-war movement. Petlin had this to say,

We had our victims, but nothing like what was being done to the Vietnamese people, and similarly nothing like what is now being done to the people of Iraq. But that was then and this is now.

Indeed that was then and this is now, and the now comes in the form of a new Peace Tower – complete with art work from contributing artists the likes of Nancy Spero, James Rosenquist, Ethelyn Honig, Hans Haacke… designed and constructed once again by Mark di Suvero, with help from Irving Petlin and a newcomer to the project Rirkrit Tiravanija. However, you won’t find the new Peace Tower, slightly altered from its initial design, on the corner of La Cienega and Sunset Boulevard in West Hollywood. Instead, you’ll find it securely in front of the The Whitney Museum of Art, NY for its Sculpture Court just in time for the 2006 Whitney Biennial. The purpose is

a reminder of the eerie applicability of such political discourse to today’s situation, just as it demonstrates how the questions it provokes about collaboration, activism, and institutionalism remain as central to today’s artists as they were to their predecessors four decades ago. Jeffrey Kastner, ARTFORUM
This also proves in my mind, how little mankind has learned the lessons taught by war.

Mark di Suvero had this to say about the new Peace Tower,

I feel the Peace Tower has that capacity for pulling all the people together through art, which is, I think, the reason why Rirkrit and I are working on it. I think that’s really Rirkrit’s central wish, and when he described that to me, I immediately wanted to participate. Whatever we can do for peace, I think we should do.
Rirkrit Tiravanija had this to say,
Many artists have strong feelings about what went on back then and what still goes on. It’s important to think about all that in the context of contemporary protest and peace movements, which in a way haven’t really gelled as much as they might have. So maybe the Peace Tower is something to help foster that. Obviously, I like the idea of platforms, of places for people to express their opinions. And I see a coming together of like-minded people as something that’s always current.
Not too unlike the modern day Blog I think.

to be continued…

mars 11, 2006

aperçu

Hervé.jpg

Projet pour la Tossée -Tourcoing
50 Têtes réfléchissantes et 10 photographies.

J’ai voulu garder de cette visite passée un matin de décembre :
quelques flocons, un ciel lourd et cet immense espace vidé. J’ai fixé
des bribes de vie, l’état passager d’un chantier de nettoyage.

J’ai souhaité prendre la peinture comme un miroir du monde, y inscrire
le reflet fugace d’une mémoire esquissée qui unis dans l’instant le
spectateur à l’espace du lieu.Puis j’ai rajouté des traces :
photographies fixées, sans temps si ce n’est celui d’un oubli proche.
Anonymes et banales, elles ponctuent l’accrochage de leur espace plat
et mat.

Il reste à se voir dans le décors, déformé, ténu, face à un dispositif
qui renvoie à soi-même, sans anecdote, mais qui du même coup, par
empathie, engage cette mémoire collective qui garde le bruit, le
travail, l’odeur, le lieu, les gens.
Cela pourrait se passer partout et pourtant, ici encore l’usine revit
le temps d’un éclat.

60 Formats 24 x30, collage, glycéro, tirages numériques. Accrochage variable.

Proposition 1
Proposition 2

mars 10, 2006

Déjà Vu ?

FD'Hondt.jpg
Fabian D'Hondt

Fabian D'Hondt is an artist living and working in Brussels, Belgium.

mars 07, 2006

Solid as SEARS and Good as GOLD

Label.jpgWhen was the last time you felt you spent a well earned $$greenback$$? When was the last time you could buy that special something for less than a dollar? How about an incredible $ 0.99 !! Well, now you can! Announcing the Gold Brand Seal of Approval stickers by one of the most recognized galleries of our time, the Masion de Reconnaissance, Abel Joseph Gallery. Now for a limited time only, buy as many as you want for the low price of $ 0.99 ea. Show your expertise wherever you go, just peel and stick! Whenever and wherever - you like that car, loved the movie you just saw, read a good book or simply approved of the latest show at the Museum of Contemporary Art - let 'em know!!

Don't wait, order now and you'll receive a beautiful 3-color laminated sticker ready to use and display. Each sticker is 3.5 inches in diameter and can be used indoors and out - absolutely no fading! Don't wait, order now while supplies last! If you order now, get 3 stickers for $ 2.79! Order now!!

Please peel and stick responsibly. Not responsible for damages to property or misuse. Stick at your own risk.
ORDER NOW !



Meter.JPG